ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 紀要
  2. 長崎外大論叢
  3. 第11号

9.11同時多発テロ事件と絶対的権限理論の「再興」 -アメリカ移民法を素材として-

https://nufs.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/201
https://nufs.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/201
407d0bbd-7b3f-45a8-83c6-8c71a456757a
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
5新井信之-9.11同時多発テロ事件と絶対的権限理論の「再興」 11-01本文PDF (2.0 MB)
license.icon
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2015-07-17
タイトル
タイトル 9.11同時多発テロ事件と絶対的権限理論の「再興」 -アメリカ移民法を素材として-
タイトル
タイトル 9.11 Terrorist Attacks and Restoration of the Plenary Power : Doctrine in the U.S. Immigration Laws
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 新井, 信之

× 新井, 信之

新井, 信之

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 414
姓名 ARAI, Nobuyuki
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks resulted in significant changes in the U.S. immigration law and policy. Six weeks later, Congress passed the USA Patriot Act to improve national security. Also in November 2002, Congress passed the Homeland Security Act, which abolished the Immigration and Naturalization Service and transferred most immigration functions to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Following the attacks, the U.S. Government carried out extensive investigations that targeted thousands of non-citizens, primarily from Arab and Muslim backgrounds. This article is at aiming to find how 9.11 terrorist attacks influenced the alien's right not to be removed from the United States without due process of law. First, Part I will demonstrate the relationship between the deportation system in immigration law and the alien enemies, introducing the Alien Enemy Act of 1798 and Ludecke v. Watkins the (1948) with historical views. Part II will introduce the 1996 immigration laws and the USA Patriot Act of 2001, criticizing the discriminative treatments of Arab and Muslim aliens by the Government. Part III will analyze Demore v. Kim (2003), Clark v. Martinez (2005), and Jama v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (2005) to examine whether the plenary power doctrine over immigration matters restored after 9.11 terrorist attacks in the U.S. immigration laws. Part IV will point out the Supreme Court's basic attitude regarding immigration and national security. Finally, this article concludes that the terrorist attacks restored the plenary power doctrine on immigration matters, but Supreme Court will continue to base their judgements strictly on past immigration case precedents, except in the case of alien terrorists. Also it suggests the role of justices in times of stress and the possibility of Japan to learn from the American case.
書誌情報 長崎外大論叢
en : The Journal of Nagasaki University of Foreign Studies

号 11, p. 1-20, 発行日 2007-12-30
出版者
出版者 長崎外国語大学・長崎外国語短期大学
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 13464981
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AA11603331
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-06-19 09:44:13.131215
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3