WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "a89b657b-71ef-4240-98f3-dbba757ed338"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 14, "id": "180", "owners": [14], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "180"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nufs.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000180", "sets": ["37"]}, "author_link": ["373", "372"], "item_10002_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2008-12-30", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "12", "bibliographicPageEnd": "38", "bibliographicPageStart": "25", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "長崎外大論叢"}, {"bibliographic_title": "The Journal of Nagasaki University of Foreign Studies", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_10002_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "In this article we will try some comparative studies of social development in Southeast Asia. Today, the term \"social development\" has come to gain a high reputation in the development industry and the field of international cooperation. Because of its high possibility and sustainability, participatory style of social development is becoming the mainstream method in the practice of development in the third world. But, insteadof its value and effectiveness, systematic case study has rarely been done since when this method began to be well known in the world of development study. In this article, as a second part of a series of comparative study that the present author is preparing, some cases of NGO\u0027s activities in the field of social development in Indonesia are examined. First, a case of Dinamika Indonesia Foundation, a local NGO in Indonesia, is taken as an example to show the difficulty of assisting the urban poor who are making their living in the scavengers\u0027work. Second, IPD ( Institute Pembaharuan Desa), a local NGO in Indonesia, is shown as a case of supporting fisherman\u0027s community that is facing the environmental and economic problems. Third, RDA (Rural Development Action),a local NGO in Indonesia, and fourth, LIFE (Live with Friends on the Earth), a Japanese NGO, both of them are shown as good examples in the field of sustainable rural development. After examining such cases above in some detail and comparing briefly with Cambodian cases taken in a preceding article, we will present theoutline of more general implications of the effectiveness and the limitations of participatory social developmentat the conclusion of this article.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10002_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "373", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "KOTORII, Shinsuke"}]}]}, "item_10002_publisher_8": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "長崎外国語大学・長崎外国語短期大学"}]}, "item_10002_source_id_11": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA11603331", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_10002_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "13464981", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "小鳥居, 伸介"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "372", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2015-07-17"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "3kotorii.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "796.9 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_11", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 796900.0, "url": {"label": "12-03本文PDF", "url": "https://nufs.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/180/files/3kotorii.pdf"}, "version_id": "9d48aa7b-ce3f-4ce1-959e-06dd90b166a1"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "東南アジア諸国の参加型社会開発に関する比較研究(2) -インドネシアの事例から-", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "東南アジア諸国の参加型社会開発に関する比較研究(2) -インドネシアの事例から-"}, {"subitem_title": "Comparative Study of Participatory Social Development in Southeast Asian Countries (2) : From Some Cases of Indonesia", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "10002", "owner": "14", "path": ["37"], "permalink_uri": "https://nufs.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/180", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2015-07-17"}, "publish_date": "2015-07-17", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "180", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["東南アジア諸国の参加型社会開発に関する比較研究(2) -インドネシアの事例から-"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
東南アジア諸国の参加型社会開発に関する比較研究(2) -インドネシアの事例から-
https://nufs.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/180
https://nufs.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1802e226ea8-0282-4e3d-99e7-f87021a15333
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
12-03本文PDF (796.9 kB)
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2015-07-17 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 東南アジア諸国の参加型社会開発に関する比較研究(2) -インドネシアの事例から- | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | Comparative Study of Participatory Social Development in Southeast Asian Countries (2) : From Some Cases of Indonesia | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
小鳥居, 伸介
× 小鳥居, 伸介 |
|||||
著者別名 | ||||||
姓名 | KOTORII, Shinsuke | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | In this article we will try some comparative studies of social development in Southeast Asia. Today, the term "social development" has come to gain a high reputation in the development industry and the field of international cooperation. Because of its high possibility and sustainability, participatory style of social development is becoming the mainstream method in the practice of development in the third world. But, insteadof its value and effectiveness, systematic case study has rarely been done since when this method began to be well known in the world of development study. In this article, as a second part of a series of comparative study that the present author is preparing, some cases of NGO's activities in the field of social development in Indonesia are examined. First, a case of Dinamika Indonesia Foundation, a local NGO in Indonesia, is taken as an example to show the difficulty of assisting the urban poor who are making their living in the scavengers'work. Second, IPD ( Institute Pembaharuan Desa), a local NGO in Indonesia, is shown as a case of supporting fisherman's community that is facing the environmental and economic problems. Third, RDA (Rural Development Action),a local NGO in Indonesia, and fourth, LIFE (Live with Friends on the Earth), a Japanese NGO, both of them are shown as good examples in the field of sustainable rural development. After examining such cases above in some detail and comparing briefly with Cambodian cases taken in a preceding article, we will present theoutline of more general implications of the effectiveness and the limitations of participatory social developmentat the conclusion of this article. | |||||
書誌情報 |
長崎外大論叢 en : The Journal of Nagasaki University of Foreign Studies 号 12, p. 25-38, 発行日 2008-12-30 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 長崎外国語大学・長崎外国語短期大学 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 13464981 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AA11603331 |